Pastner
Brands is a calendar-year firm with operations in several countries. As
part of its executive compensation plan, at January 1, 2013, the
company issued 400,000 executive stock options permitting executives to
buy 400,000 shares of Pastner stock for $34 per share. One-fourth of the
options vest in each of the next four years beginning at December 31,
2013 (graded vesting). Pastner elects to separate the total award into
four groups (or tranches) according to the year in which they vest and
measures the compensation cost for each vesting date as a separate
award. The fair value of each tranche is estimated at January 1, 2013,
as follows:
Vesting Date | Amount Vesting | Fair Value per Option | ||||
Dec. 31, 2013 | 25 | % | $ | 3.50 | ||
Dec. 31, 2014 | 25 | % | $ | 4.00 | ||
Dec. 31, 2015 | 25 | % | $ | 4.50 | ||
Dec. 31, 2016 | 25 | % | $ | 5.00 | ||
Required: | |
1. |
Determine
the compensation expense related to the options to be recorded each
year 2013–2016, assuming Pastner allocates the compensation cost for
each of the four groups (tranches) separately.
|
Compensation Expense Recorded in: | ||||
Shares | ||||
Vesting at: | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 |
Dec. 31, 2013 | $ | |||
Dec. 31, 2014 | $ | |||
Dec. 31, 2015 | $ | |||
Dec. 31, 2016 | $ | |||
$ | $ | $ | $ | |
Total | $ | |||
2. |
Determine
the compensation expense related to the options to be recorded each
year 2013–2016, assuming Pastner uses the straight-line method to
allocate the total compensation cost.
|
2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | Total | |
Compensation expense | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ |
Explanation:
1.
2.
We treat each individual vesting date as a separate award: |
Vesting Date | Number Vesting | Fair Value per Option | Compensation Cost | |||||
Dec. 31, 2013 | 100,000 | $ | 3.50 | $ | 350,000 | |||
Dec. 31, 2014 | 100,000 | $ | 4.00 | 400,000 | ||||
Dec. 31, 2015 | 100,000 | $ | 4.50 | 450,000 | ||||
Dec. 31, 2016 | 100,000 | $ | 5.00 | 500,000 | ||||
$ | 1,700,000 | |||||||
Also, a company must have recognized at least the amount vested by that date. The allocation here meets that constraint:
|
• | The $825,000 recognized in 2013 exceeds the $350,000 vested. |
• |
The $1,300,000 ($825,000 + 475,000) recognized by 2014 exceeds the $750,000 ($350,000 + 400,000) vested by the same time.
|
• |
The
$1,575,000 ($825,000 + 475,000 + 275,000) recognized by 2015 exceeds
the $1,200,000 ($350,000 + 400,000 + 450,000) vested by the same time.
|
2.
Companies
are allowed to use the straight-line method. The $1,700,000 total
compensation cost is allocated equally to 2013, 2014, 2015, and 2016 at
$425,000 per year. Also, a company must have recognized at least the
amount vested by that date. The straight-line allocation meets that
constraint:
|
• | The $425,000 recognized in 2013 exceeds the $350,000 vested. |
• |
The $850,000 ($425,000 + 425,000) recognized by 2014 exceeds the $750,000 ($350,000 + 400,000) vested by the same time.
|
• |
The
$1,275,000 ($425,000 + 425,000 + 425,000) recognized by 2015 exceeds
the $1,200,000 ($350,000 + 400,000 + 450,000) vested by the same time.
|